↓

We are unable to directly assist those seeking help
If you are looking for legal or practical advice and support, please visit www.advicenow.org.uk

  • LiP Network
  • LiPSS
LiPN
  • Contact
  • Log in

The Litigant in Person Network
Connecting the community working to improve access to justice

  • Home
  • About
  • Member organisations
  • News
  • Join the Network

↓ Navigation

News
  • All topics
  • Opinion
  • Projects
    • Clinic
    • Courts & Tribunals
    • Public Legal Education
    • Digital
    • Mental Health & Vulnerability Working Party
  • Resources
    • Finding advice
    • Courts & Tribunals
    • Pro Bono
    • Public Legal Education
    • Area of law
      • Employment law
      • Family law
      • Immigration law
      • Social welfare
      • Housing
    • Organisational
      • Digital
      • Funding
      • Volunteering
      • Training
      • Access to Justice News
  • Research and Policy
    • Research & Reports
    • Policy
      • All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG)
      • HMCTS
      • LIP Engagement Group
    • International
  • Court Reform
  • Mental Health
  • Events
    • National Pro Bono Week
  • Vacancies
  • Criminal Law

Regions
  • All regions
  • National
  • East Midlands
  • East of England
  • London
  • Northern Ireland
  • North East
  • North West
  • South East
  • South West
  • Wales
  • West Midlands
  • Yorkshire and the Humber
  • International

Organisational – National

#GeneralElection2019 - Human Rights: what do the parties say? Excellent infographic by Rights Info

Published 27/11/2019 by Claire Gilbert

THE GENERAL ELECTION & HUMAN RIGHTS Rights Info is looking at each of the party manifestos and has picked out the key policies relating to human rights. There are huge issues in this election around access to justice and protections of rights. This useful summary brings together the pledges in one place. Rights Info will be updating their page as new manifestos are released.


Call for evidence: Very High Cost Cases (VHCCs) - delays and other problems?

Published 20/11/2019 by Claire Gilbert

The Bar Council Remuneration Committee is reviewing issues faced by barristers across all civil Very High Cost Cases (VHCCs) excluding family VHCCs, including late payments. that you have been experiencing, with the intention of raising the issue with the Legal Aid Agency. The review is specifically concerned with delays, but other issues should also be raised. Deadline for responses has been extended to Thursday 28th November.


Legal Reporting Awards - competition now open! (Bar Council annual award)

Published 20/11/2019 by Claire Gilbert

Calling all Journalists - The Bar Council's 28th Legal Reporting Awards competition has opened. The competition is open to print/online and broadcast journalists in recognition of the media's role in promoting a greater understanding of the law to the public. The winning entries in each category will be awarded £1,000 in prize money. Entries close 2 December 2019 23:59pm.


Lesson for funders – public support for Human Rights must be cultivated

Published 20/11/2019 by Claire Gilbert

The Thomas Paine Initiative has called on funders to help capture the public’s hearts and minds, and counteract the threat to democracy from populist leaders. “Public opinion cannot be left to chance”, and communications strategy must be nurtured“at every stage” of the grant making process.


Is there a ‘culture of refusal’ within the LAA? Legal Action Group needs your views - by 15th November.

Published 13/11/2019 by Claire Gilbert

Is there a ‘culture of refusal’ within the LAA? Legal Action Group needs your views- by 15th November.


Supreme Court decision on Human Rights duties for Courts & Local Authorities - DWP & “Bedroom Tax”

Published 13/11/2019 by Claire Gilbert

The Supreme Court clarified today that Courts & Local Authorities can set aside government regulations that are incompatible with human rights legislation. The case stemmed from challenges to the 2013 housing benefit changes widely labelled the 'bedroom tax'and was supported by human rights organisations Liberty, Child Poverty Action Group and Public Law Project (PLP), with international firm Herbert Smith Freehills. PLP director Jo Hickman said: 'This judgment re-affirms that people should be able to enforce their human rights under the European Convention on Human Rights in any court or tribunal, without having to bring separate legal proceedings - just as the Human Rights Act says they should be able to.


Watch! Video of Solicitor General on how to make Pro Bono Costs Orders

Published 13/11/2019 by Claire Gilbert

How much do you know about Pro Bono Costs Orders? Watch our video of the Solicitor General talking about Pro Bono Costs


myCourtroom – exploring the family court

Published 08/07/2019

Cafcass and the Centre for Child Protection at the University of Kent have launched an interactive online court simulation to help prepare separated parents for family proceedings.


Do clients prefer online contact to speaking with lawyers?

Published 03/05/2019 by Stacey Lamb

Research by mmadigital shows that cost and lack of understanding of legal services could see consumer clients try to avoid direct contact with lawyers.

  • @LiPsstrategy
  • Find out more about The Litigant in Person Support Strategy

Funded by The Legal Aid Foundation

We’re new – we’d love to hear your feedback

By using this site, you consent to our use of cookies. Please see our privacy policy.
© 2019 The Access to Justice Foundation PO Box 64162 London WC2A 9AN
The Access to Justice Foundation is a company limited by guarantee (No. 6714178) and is a charity registered in England and Wales (No. 1126147) and in Scotland (No. SC048584). Its registered office is The National Pro Bono Centre, 48 Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1JF.
Website by MID